Title: The Kant and Race Debate: A Frederick Douglass InterventionPublished by: The Southern Journal of Philosophy
Release Date: 2023
Pages: 11
Read PDF
Samuel Fleischacker is interested in two questions that are—what he
refers to as—a rephrasing of three implications Charles Mills takes away from his
encounter with Kant: (1) Is Kant’s moral philosophy racist at its core? and (2)
Whether it is or not, how should we respond to the fact that Kant displays open
racism in some of his writings when we study, teach, or try to make use of his purportedly egalitarian teachings? Frederick Douglass was an abolitionist who wrestled with similar questions regarding the liberatory and inclusive nature of emancipatory documents like the Constitution. In this essay, I want to consider Douglass’s changing views on this issue and reasons behind them to think about how he might offer insights into this current debate concerning Kant and race. In doing so, I will consider to what extent Fleischacker adheres to Douglass’s guidelines on this matter as he makes his case. I then offer suggestions on how to move forward.